Table of Contents
Credits
Hosts: Nuria Sanchez-Clemente, Sara Dong
Guest: Hermione Lyall
Writing: Justin Penner
Producing/Editing/Cover Art/Infographics: Sara Dong
Our Guests
Guest Consultant
Dr. Hermione Lyall
I am a consultant in paediatric infectious diseases at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Professor of Practice at Imperial College. I run both HIV and Congenital infection clinics at St Mary’s Hospital in London, and I am ward-attending consultant for Paediatric Infectious Diseases 4 months per year. I am a member of PENTA-ID and participate in HIV treatment trials for children. I have been actively involved in development of international courses for education for Paediatric Infections for many years, working with PENTA and the European Society for paediatric Infectious Diseases (ESPID). From 2018 – 2021, I was a member of the board of ESPID. I am now a Trustee on the board of the ESPID Foundation. In 2020, with colleagues from around Europe, we set up CCMVNET (ccmvnet@gmail.com ) – an international network built around a registry of children with congenital CMV, currently I am chair of the network. Our aim is to learn as much as possible about this condition, and promote collaboration for research into prevention and treatment. Fundamentally, I am a front line clinician who can bring people together – children, families and peer supporters ,clinicians, laboratory scientists, epidemiologists, virologists, pharmacologists, and trialists,– all the team that we will need to change the future for children with congenital infections.
Guest Co-Host
Dr. Nuria Sanchez-Clemente
I am a paediatric registrar and NIHR (National Institute for Health Research) Academic Clinical Lecturer in paediatric infection and immunity at St. George’s University, London. My academic and clinical interests are around congenital infections, arboviruses, neglected tropical diseases and migrant health. In 2010 I undertook an MSc in Tropical Medicine at The London School of Hygiene (LSHTM) and Tropical Medicine and travelled to Peruvian Andes to undertake the first systematic review on Peruvian Bartonellosis. From 2014-2017 I lived in Brazil where I did my PhD on congenital Zika syndrome, studying the perinatal outcomes of a Zika pregnancy cohort in the state of Sao Paulo. Since then, I have continued to work with teams in Brazil, LSHTM and WHO to study the long term consequences for children born with congenital Zika infection and the wider impacts on their families and societies. My more recent academic and clinical interests are around migrant health and health inequalities and I am studying large primary care datasets in order to compare patterns of paediatric primary and secondary healthcare usage between migrants and non-migrants in the UK. In the last year I have also been working on the ‘Respond’ Refugee Family Project at UCLH, leading infectious diseases clinics for Unaccompanied Asylum Seeking Children and have been working as a volunteer with Doctors of the World studying maternal and postnatal outcomes. Ultimately, I hope through my research and clinical endeavours to work towards improving the health of the most marginalised communities.
Culture
Hermione shared Anthony Doerr’s book Cloud Cuckoo Land, “if you want an amazing book that has everything about humanity in it, the past, the present, the future”
Consult Notes
Case Summary
- 29 year old G2P1 previously healthy woman at 14 weeks gestation who developed a rash, fever, cough, pharyngitis who was found to be CMV IgM+/IgG-, low avidity, +urine CMV PCR
- Baby was born at 38 weeks gestation and found to have positive urine and saliva PCR with MRI that demonstrates polymicrogyria. She was diagnosed with congenital CMV and treated with valganciclovir
Key Points
Congenital CMV infection has a wide range of clinical manifestations
- Let’s define some terminology that is frequently used first. Infants with congenital CMV infection are classified according to whether they have symptoms at the time of birth:
- Symptomatic (one or more symptoms at birth)
- Primary neurophenotype (refers to patients with only CNS manifestations; newly described category, some inconsistency in published literature)
- Asymptomatic (no apparent symptoms at birth; important to note that these infants may still develop hearing loss or symptoms later in life)
- Asymptomatic with isolated hearing loss (this categorization is a bit inconsistent as well, as Hermione noted in the episode)
- ~10% of infants with congenital CMV infection will exhibit findings at birth (symptomatic disease). These findings may include:
- Jaundice, direct hyperbilirubinemia
- Petechiae/purpura due to thrombocytopenia
- Hepatosplenomegaly
- Small for gestational age
- Microcephaly
- Intracerebral (typically periventricular) calcifications
- Chorioretinitis
- Sensorineural hearing loss (more on this next)
- Hemolytic anemia
- Lethargy, hypotonia
- Seizures
- ~10% of symptomatic congenital CMV infected babies will have severe life-threatening disease such as sepsis like illness, myocarditis, viral induced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and/or other severe end organ involvement
- Developmental delays can occur among affected infants in later infancy and early childhood
- Death attributed to congenital CMV occurs in 3-10% of infants with symptomatic disease
Congenital CMV is the leading non-genetic cause of sensorineural hearing loss in children in the US
- ~20% of all hearing loss at birth and 25% of all hearing loss at 4 years of age is attributable to congenital CMV
- This sequelae occurs in up to 50% of children with symptomatic congenital infections and up to 15% of those with asymptomatic congenital infections
- ~40% of infected children who ultimately develop sensorineural hearing loss will not have hearing loss detectable within the first month of life
- Children with asymptomatic congenital CMV infection are less likely to have delayed onset hearing loss compared to symptomatic patients and less frequently have bilateral severe hearing loss.
- **Hearing loss often progresses over time and both ears should be closely monitored for progression
- A few reviews/studies of congenital CMV and hearing loss:
- Goderis J, De Leenheer E, Smets K, Van Hoecke H, Keymeulen A, Dhooge I. Hearing loss and congenital CMV infection: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):972-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1173. PMID: 25349318.
- Dreher AM, Arora N, Fowler KB, Novak Z, Britt WJ, Boppana SB, Ross SA. Spectrum of disease and outcome in children with symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 2014 Apr;164(4):855-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 14. PMID: 24433826; PMCID: PMC3982912.
- Foulon I, De Brucker Y, Buyl R, Lichtert E, Verbruggen K, Piérard D, Camfferman FA, Gucciardo L, Gordts F. Hearing Loss With Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2):e20183095. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3095. Epub 2019 Jul 2. PMID: 31266824.
- Lanzieri TM, Chung W, Flores M, Blum P, Caviness AC, Bialek SR, Grosse SD, Miller JA, Demmler-Harrison G; Congenital Cytomegalovirus Longitudinal Study Group. Hearing Loss in Children With Asymptomatic Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3):e20162610. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2610. Epub 2017 Feb 16. PMID: 28209771; PMCID: PMC5330400.
- Torrecillas V, Allen CM, Greene T, Park A, Chung W, Lanzieri TM, Demmler-Harrison G. Should You Follow the Better-Hearing Ear for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection and Isolated Sensorineural Hearing Loss? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jan;162(1):114-120. doi: 10.1177/0194599819880348. Epub 2019 Oct 8. PMID: 31593522; PMCID: PMC7274837.
We will focus on congenital infection in these Consult Notes, but remember that CMV transmission can occur horizontally (by direct person-to-person contact with virus-containing secretions), vertically (from mother to infant before, during, or after birth), via transfusions from infected donors, and solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A few summary points on horizontal and vertical transmission with this episode:
- Horizontal transmission is result of exposure to saliva, urine, or genital secretions from infected individuals
- Spread of CMV in households and child care centers is well documented
- Excretion rates from urine or saliva in children 1-3 years of age who attend child care centers usually range from 30-40%, but can be as high as 70%. In addition, children who attend child care frequently excrete large quantities of virus for prolonged periods
- Young children can transmit CMV to their parents, including mothers who may be pregnant, and other caregivers, including child care staff
- AAP Red Book Cytomegalovirus Chapter
- Pass RF, Hutto C, Ricks R, Cloud GA. Increased rate of cytomegalovirus infection among parents of children attending day-care centers. N Engl J Med. 1986 May 29;314(22):1414-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198605293142204. PMID: 3010113.
- Adler SP. Cytomegalovirus and child day care. Evidence for an increased infection rate among day-care workers. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1290-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211903. PMID: 2552316.
- Vertical transmission of CMV to infant can occur in utero (by transplacental passage of maternal bloodborne virus) as well as at birth (by passage thru infected maternal genital tract)
- In utero fetal infection can occur:
- In women with no preexisting CMV immunity (maternal primary infection), or
- In women with preexisting Ab to CMV (maternal nonprimary infection) >> by reinfection (acquisition of different viral strain during pregnancy) or by reactivation of existing maternal infection
- Infection and sequelae can occur irrespective of trimester when mom is infected, but severe sequelae are associated more commonly with maternal infection acquired in the first trimester. Hermione discussed in the show that if there is primary seroconversion, there is about a 30-40% risk of transmission to fetus, and emphasized this point about how first trimester primary infection is associated with highest risk of damage to fetus. Infants infected as result of primary maternal infection are more likely to have symptoms at birth and suffer long term sequelae than those as result of maternal recurrent CMV infection – but the risk of hearing loss appears similar in both groups
- Here is the study that she mentioned from which followed >250 women with primary infection and their babies up to 24 mo of age. 16% of these babies had significant sequelae including neurologic and sensorineural hearing loss: Faure-Bardon V, Magny JF, Parodi M, et al. Sequelae of Congenital Cytomegalovirus Following Maternal Primary Infections Are Limited to Those Acquired in the First Trimester of Pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(9):1526-1532. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy1128
- Picone O, Vauloup-Fellous C, Cordier AG, Guitton S, Senat MV, Fuchs F, Ayoubi JM, Grangeot Keros L, Benachi A. A series of 238 cytomegalovirus primary infections during pregnancy: description and outcome. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Aug;33(8):751-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.4118. Epub 2013 May 1. PMID: 23553686.
- Chatzakis C, Ville Y, Makrydimas G, Dinas K, Zavlanos A, Sotiriadis A. Timing of primary maternal cytomegalovirus infection and rates of vertical transmission and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):870-883.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.038. Epub 2020 May 24. PMID: 32460972.
- Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol. 2007 Jul-Aug;17(4):253-76. doi: 10.1002/rmv.535. PMID: 17579921.
- Goderis J, De Leenheer E, Smets K, Van Hoecke H, Keymeulen A, Dhooge I. Hearing loss and congenital CMV infection: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):972-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1173. PMID: 25349318.
- Williamson WD, Demmler GJ, Percy AK, Catlin FI. Progressive hearing loss in infants with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatrics. 1992 Dec;90(6):862-6. PMID: 1331946.
- Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Dahle AJ, Boppana S, Britt WJ, Pass RF. Progressive and fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss in children with asymptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr. 1997 Apr;130(4):624-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70248-8. PMID: 9108862.
- These infections can also occur regardless of whether its primary or nonprimary maternal infection. It’s estimated that >75% of infants with congenital CMV in the US are born to women with nonprimary infection.
- In addition, postnatal acquisition can occur via ingestion of CMV+ human milk. Most infants who acquire CMV from ingestion of human milk from CMV seropositive mother do not develop clinical illness, likely because of presence of passively transferred maternal antibody
- In utero fetal infection can occur:
The diagnosis of congenital CMV relies on a high index of suspicion, such as what we had in this case. Here is a quick summary of clinical scenarios to think about congenital CMV infection:
- Newborn with signs, symptoms, or abnormal neuroimaging consistent with congenital CMV disease (as noted previously)
- Newborn with documented sensorineural hearing loss regardless of whether it is accompanied by other CMV symptoms
- Newborn born to mother with known or suspected CMV infection during pregnancy, including:
- Maternal seroconversion during pregnancy
- Presumed maternal primary CMV infection (based on IgG/IgM)
- Mononucleosis like illness during pregnancy
- Abnormal fetal imaging
- Immunocompromised babies
So how do we go about testing/diagnosis? Hermione outlined her approach of (1) confirming if this is congenital CMV with diagnostic testing (2) then detecting whether there are end-organ sequelae of congenital CMV
Congenital infection requires detection of CMV or CMV DNA in urine, saliva, blood, or CSF obtained within 3 weeks of birth (detection beyond this initial period of life could reflect postnatal acquisition of virus)
- Urine or saliva PCR are frequently used, and the sensitivity and specificity is >95%
- Urine samples are generally preferred over saliva samples
- Saliva samples are easier to collect, but:
- May require confirmation with urine testing (because of potential false positive due to contamination of saliva with CMV in human milk)
- False negatives with saliva tests can occur due to sampling errors with inadequate amount
- Exler S, Daiminger A, Grothe M, Schalasta G, Enders G, Enders M. Primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in pregnancy: Diagnostic value of CMV PCR in saliva compared to urine at birth. J Clin Virol. 2019 Aug;117:33-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.05.015. Epub 2019 May 31. PMID: 31176209.
- Ross SA, Michaels MG, Ahmed A, Palmer AL, Sánchez PJ, Bernstein DI, Feja K, Stewart A, Boppana SB, Fowler KB. Contribution of Breastfeeding to False-Positive Saliva Polymerase Chain Reaction for Newborn Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening. J Infect Dis. 2018 Apr 23;217(10):1612-1615. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy057. PMID: 29401303; PMCID: PMC5913650.
- Advantage of PCR: high sensitivity, quantitative result, rapid turnaround time, lower cost, and good availability in most hospital labs (as well as good stability of test if requires transport to reference lab)
- Other tests include: viral culture, modified culture (aka rapid culture or shell vial assay)
- The analytical sensitivity of CMV PCR of dried blood spots is low, limiting use of this type of specimen for widespread screening for congenital CMV infection (you may hear term Guthrie card). Positive PCR assay result from neonatal dried blood spot confirms congenital infection, but a negative result does not rule out congenital infection (sensitivity about 80%)
- Remember: serologic testing for IgM is not recommended for diagnosis (reduced specificity; may yield false positive results) >> and IgG in the blood at this age reflects maternal IgG level
- Prenatal diagnosis of fetal CMV infection can be diagnosed by detection of CMV in amniotic fluid as well
- Differentiation between congenital and perinatal infection is difficult at later than 2-4 weeks of age unless clinical manifestations of the former, such as chorioretinitis or intracranial calcifications, are present
Next, the evaluation would look for detection of possible sequelae of congenital CMV. This generally includes: ophthalmology exam, heading imaging, CBC, LFTs
- For neuroimaging, brain MRI and head ultrasound are used:
- Ultrasound should be obtained in all infected babies. US is good for detecting calcifications and is better able to detect lenticulostriate vasculopathy than advanced imaging >> it will detect most major, obvious abnormalities
- Most infants with abnormal US, abnormal neuro exam, seizures, or other concerns will undergo more advanced neuroimaging:
- MRI can show classic signs such as periventricular cysts, increased white matter intensity. MRI is more sensitive in detecting vasculitis, polymicrogyria (and other neuronal migration disorders, which are associated with early infection and most serious consequences). Hermione pointed out that dilated ventricles can be seen, but this is often more representative of the loss of brain tissue
- CT may be considered, but requires radiation exposure. MRI is more sensitive but often may be limited by longer procedure time, need for sedation
Just to back-up a little bit, I wanted to summarize a few of the points related to CMV infection in pregnancy
- The diagnosis of suspected maternal primary CMV infection is based on serology:
- Seroconversion of CMV specific IgG in paired acute and convalescent sera (3-4 wks apart) is diagnostic
- The presence of IgM alone is not helpful for timing the onset of infection (it can remain positive for over a year, is present in 75-90% of women with acute infection, can revert back to positive in women with reactivation, and can be false positive in setting of other viral infections)
- Determining IgG avidity can be used to assess the acuity of infection:
- High anti-CMV IgG avidity suggests primary infection occurred >6 months in the past
- Low anti-CMV IgG avidity suggests a recent primary infection (within 2-4 mo)
- The commercial avidity assays have variable cutoffs among labs
- More on avidity below:
- Grangeot-Keros L, Mayaux MJ, Lebon P, Freymuth F, Eugene G, Stricker R, Dussaix E. Value of cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG avidity index for the diagnosis of primary CMV infection in pregnant women. J Infect Dis. 1997 Apr;175(4):944-6. doi: 10.1086/513996. PMID: 9086155.
- Eggers M, Bäder U, Enders G. Combination of microneutralization and avidity assays: improved diagnosis of recent primary human cytomegalovirus infection in single serum sample of second trimester pregnancy. J Med Virol. 2000 Mar;60(3):324-30. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9071(200003)60:3<324::aid-jmv11>3.0.co;2-d. PMID: 10630965.
- Kanengisser-Pines B, Hazan Y, Pines G, Appelman Z. High cytomegalovirus IgG avidity is a reliable indicator of past infection in patients with positive IgM detected during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2009;37(1):15-8. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2009.012. PMID: 18673093.
- Leruez-Ville M, Sellier Y, Salomon LJ, Stirnemann JJ, Jacquemard F, Ville Y. Prediction of fetal infection in cases with cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin M in the first trimester of pregnancy: a retrospective cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(10):1428-35. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit059. Epub 2013 Feb 7. PMID: 23392397.
- Seroconversion of CMV specific IgG in paired acute and convalescent sera (3-4 wks apart) is diagnostic
- Experts suggest offering amniocentesis for prenatal/fetal diagnosis when infection is suspected due to primary maternal infection or concerning findings on ultrasound
- The rationale to offer prenatal diagnosis: (a) determine whether fetus is infected (b) couples may use information in decision-making regarding termination of pregnancy or preparation for birth of infected and possibly affected child (c ) impacts frequency of fetal monitoring
- Amniocentesis fluid can be sent for CMV DNA PCR
Is there anything we can do to prevent transmission to baby? In this episode’s case, the example patient declined any intervention, but the possibility of providing therapy to mother during pregnancy to prevent infection was discussed
- First off: There is another section on screening of neonates later, but what about during pregnancy? Will note here that there is no consensus on whether all women of childbearing age should know their CMV serostatus. Some experts suggest that women should be screened while other professional organizations (such as American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine) recommend against routine screening
- Recommend against routine serologic screening for CMV
- No vaccine available for seronegative women
- In seropositive women, difficult to distinguish between primary and nonprimary infection as well as the timing of infection
- Seropositive women remain at risk from reactivation of latent virus and/or reinfection with new viral strain
- No clear evidence that antiviral treatment or hyperimmune globulin prevents infection or sequelae
- If fetal infection is detected, no clear way to predict whether fetus will develop sequelae
- Routine screening could lead to unnecessary and/or harmful intervention
- Proponents of universal screening
- Knowledge of seronegative status and counseling may increase some patients’ motivation to practice good hygiene and thus decrease risk of seroconversion during pregnancy
So what are the interventions that have been studied?
- There isn’t clear evidence that antiviral drug treatment of primary infection in pregnant women prevents CMV sequelae in the neonate. Here are some studies looking at use of valacyclovir:
- Hermione discussed this 2020 prospective randomized placebo controlled trial trial in the Lancet. The authors investigated treating women who seroconverted in the first trimester (before 16 weeks gestation) with high dose valacyclovir. The overall risk of transmission to the fetus was reduced by 63% in treated women. When they separated between periconceptual infection and actual first trimester infection, it was more like 77% for the women. The crucial thing was the time it took to get started on valacyclovir in relation to timing of seroconversion >> the shorter that was, the better the chance of the fetus not being infected. Shahar-Nissan K, Pardo J, Peled O, Krause I, Bilavsky E, Wiznitzer A, Hadar E, Amir J. Valaciclovir to prevent vertical transmission of cytomegalovirus after maternal primary infection during pregnancy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Sep 12;396(10253):779-785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31868-7. Erratum in: Lancet. 2020 Oct 10;396(10257):1070. PMID: 32919517.
- This is another small study: Faure-Bardon V, Fourgeaud J, Stirnemann J, Leruez-Ville M, Ville Y. Secondary prevention of congenital cytomegalovirus infection with valacyclovir following maternal primary infection in early pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):576-581. doi: 10.1002/uog.23685. Epub 2021 Sep 13. PMID: 33998084.
- An observational study: Jacquemard F, Yamamoto M, Costa JM, Romand S, Jaqz-Aigrain E, Dejean A, Daffos F, Ville Y. Maternal administration of valaciclovir in symptomatic intrauterine cytomegalovirus infection. BJOG. 2007 Sep;114(9):1113-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01308.x. Epub 2007 Jul 6. PMID: 17617198.
- This is a multicenter phase II study of oral valacyclovir treatment in pregnant women with CMV infected fetus, which found improved neonatal outcome of infected fetuses without severe brain abnormalities: Leruez-Ville M, Ghout I, Bussières L, Stirnemann J, Magny JF, Couderc S, Salomon LJ, Guilleminot T, Aegerter P, Benoist G, Winer N, Picone O, Jacquemard F, Ville Y. In utero treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus infection with valacyclovir in a multicenter, open-label, phase II study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):462.e1-462.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.003. Epub 2016 Apr 13. PMID: 27083761.
- There is also no clear established benefit for use of CMV-specific hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital infection. Observational studies seemed promising although randomized trials (cited below) have not shown benefit
- Revello MG, Lazzarotto T, Guerra B, Spinillo A, Ferrazzi E, Kustermann A, Guaschino S, Vergani P, Todros T, Frusca T, Arossa A, Furione M, Rognoni V, Rizzo N, Gabrielli L, Klersy C, Gerna G; CHIP Study Group. A randomized trial of hyperimmune globulin to prevent congenital cytomegalovirus. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1316-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310214. PMID: 24693891.
- Hughes BL, Clifton RG, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Dinsmoor MJ, Reddy UM, Pass R, Allard D, Mallett G, Fette LM, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Varner MW, Goodnight WH, Tita ATN, Costantine MM, Swamy GK, Gibbs RS, Chien EK, Chauhan SP, El-Sayed YY, Casey BM, Parry S, Simhan HN, Napolitano PG, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. A Trial of Hyperimmune Globulin to Prevent Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 29;385(5):436-444. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913569. PMID: 34320288; PMCID: PMC8363945.
- A few notes:
- These trials don’t really examine longterm hearing loss
- CMV Ig might have been administered after already infected
- Some women might have become infected after being screened
- Sample size limitations
- Hermione pointed out though that dosing and frequency of administration might not have been adequate
- All in all, this is a very expensive and very interventional option, so not applicable in most locations
- A few notes:
- So what else can we tell pregnant patients for prevention? There are behavioral risk reduction interventions, which you can review in this article: Barber V, Calvert A, Vandrevala T, Star C, Khalil A, Griffiths P, Heath PT, Jones CE. Prevention of Acquisition of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pregnancy Through Hygiene-based Behavioral Interventions: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020 Oct;39(10):949-954. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002763. PMID: 32502127.
- Personal hygiene, including handwashing with soap and water after contact with diapers or oral and nasal sections, particularly with children in daycare
- Avoid kissing children under age of 6 on mouth or cheek
- Do not share food, drinks, oral utensils
- Clean toys, countertops, other surfaces that come into contact with children’s urine or saliva
- We know that these interventions might be easier said than done when you have a toddler at home, but this knowledge does seem to change maternal behavior…
- Vauloup-Fellous C, Picone O, Cordier AG, et al. Does hygiene counseling have an impact on the rate of CMV primary infection during pregnancy? Results of a 3-year prospective study in a French hospital. J Clin Virol. 2009;46 Suppl 4:S49-S53. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2009.09.003
- Adler SP, Finney JW, Manganello AM, Best AM. Prevention of child-to-mother transmission of cytomegalovirus among pregnant women. J Pediatr. 2004;145(4):485-491. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.05.041
- Revello MG, Tibaldi C, Masuelli G, et al. Prevention of Primary Cytomegalovirus Infection in Pregnancy. EBioMedicine. 2015;2(9):1205-1210. Published 2015 Aug 6. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.08.003
Which infected infants with congenital CMV should be treated?
- Antiviral therapy is recommended for (1) infants with symptomatic infection (2) children with CMV as well as primary immunodeficiency
- There are different opinions on whether children with asymptomatic infection with isolated hearing loss should be treated
- There is an ongoing randomized trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03107871
- Here are some resources regarding treatment:
- International consensus recommendations: Rawlinson WD, Boppana SB, Fowler KB, Kimberlin DW, Lazzarotto T, Alain S, Daly K, Doutré S, Gibson L, Giles ML, Greenlee J, Hamilton ST, Harrison GJ, Hui L, Jones CA, Palasanthiran P, Schleiss MR, Shand AW, van Zuylen WJ. Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy and the neonate: consensus recommendations for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Jun;17(6):e177-e188. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30143-3. Epub 2017 Mar 11. PMID: 28291720.
- European consensus statement: Luck SE, Wieringa JW, Blázquez-Gamero D, et al. Congenital Cytomegalovirus: A European Expert Consensus Statement on Diagnosis and Management. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(12):1205-1213. doi:10.1097/INF.0000000000001763
- Per AAP Red Book:
- Infants with asymptomatic congenital CMV should not receive antiviral treatment outside the confines of research study
- Neonates with mild symptomatic disease or with isolated SNHL and no other disease manifestations should not routinely receive antiviral treatment because of lack of data suggesting benefit in this less severely affected population
- What’s the evidence of treating?
- Earlier Kimberlin study – Symptomatic neonates <1 month of age (gestation age >=32 wks) were treated with 6 weeks of IV ganciclovir 6 mg/kg BID >> improved hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 6 months. Significant loss to follow-up. Randomized, not placebo-controlled. Will note the neutropenia toxicity with GCV in the group. Kimberlin DW, Lin CY, Sánchez PJ, et al. Effect of ganciclovir therapy on hearing in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease involving the central nervous system: a randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2003;143(1):16-25. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(03)00192-6
- More recent Kimberlin study – Children with symptomatic CMV received 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir 16 mg/kg BD vs 6-month. Neonates with symptomatic congenital CMV disease with or without CNV involvement have improved audiologic and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age when treated with oral valganciclovir for 6 months.: Kimberlin DW, Jester PM, Sánchez PJ, et al. Valganciclovir for symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(10):933-943. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1404599
- Symptomatic infants (with CNS disease) receiving IV ganciclovir compared to those with no treatment had fewer developmental delays at 6 and 12 months. Oliver SE, Cloud GA, Sánchez PJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes following ganciclovir therapy in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infections involving the central nervous system. J Clin Virol. 2009;46 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S22-S26. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2009.08.012
How to treat:
- Antiviral therapy should be started once testing is confirmed, and benefit has been shown by starting within first 30 days of life
- Oral valganciclovir or IV ganciclovir is used (depends on severity of disease and whether infant has any conditions that would impact absorption of enteral meds)
- Notes on medication monitoring:
- Needs about monthly dose adjustments to account for weight gain
- Significant neutropenia occurs in ~20% of infants treated with oral valganciclovir and in ~66% of infants treated with parenteral ganciclovir. Neutropenia (when occurs) is more common during first 4-6 weeks of therapy
- More uncommonly, thrombocytopenia can occur
- Hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are observed in some infants
What monitoring do these children need?
- Serial audiologic and ophthalmologic assessments
- CNS manifestations such as intellectual disability, cerebral palsy, and seizures may require special services such as speech, language, occupational, and/or physical therapy
- These babies also can develop behavioral disorders, such as autism spectrum disorder
A few quick notes on newborn screening for congenital CMV.
- Newborns are not routinely screened for CMV, but given impact of congenital CMV, many experts are involved in ongoing discussions about targeted and/or universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection
- The goal of newborn screening would be early identification of infected infants who may benefit from antiviral therapy and identifying asymptomatic infants who might be at risk for delayed hearing loss
- Here are some papers/overview on the subject:
- Lazzarotto T, Blázquez-Gamero D, Delforge ML, et al. Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection: A Narrative Review of the Issues in Screening and Management From a Panel of European Experts. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:13. Published 2020 Jan 31. doi:10.3389/fped.2020.00013
- Williams EJ, Kadambari S, Berrington JE, Luck S, Atkinson C, Walter S, Embleton ND, James P, Griffiths P, Davis A, Sharland M, Clark JE. Feasibility and acceptability of targeted screening for congenital CMV-related hearing loss. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 May;99(3):F230-6. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305276. Epub 2014 Mar 4. PMID: 24596404.
- de Vries JJ, Vossen AC, Kroes AC, van der Zeijst BA. Implementing neonatal screening for congenital cytomegalovirus: addressing the deafness of policy makers. Rev Med Virol. 2011 Jan;21(1):54-61. doi: 10.1002/rmv.679. Epub 2011 Jan 18. PMID: 21246642.
- Cannon MJ, Griffiths PD, Aston V, Rawlinson WD. Universal newborn screening for congenital CMV infection: what is the evidence of potential benefit? Rev Med Virol. 2014 Sep;24(5):291-307. doi: 10.1002/rmv.1790. Epub 2014 Apr 24. PMID: 24760655; PMCID: PMC4494732.
- Nishida K, Morioka I, Nakamachi Y, Kobayashi Y, Imanishi T, Kawano S, Iwatani S, Koda T, Deguchi M, Tanimura K, Yamashita D, Nibu K, Funakoshi T, Ohashi M, Inoue N, Iijima K, Yamada H. Neurological outcomes in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus-infected infants after introduction of newborn urine screening and antiviral treatment. Brain Dev. 2016 Feb;38(2):209-16. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 14. PMID: 26282917.
- Demmler-Harrison GJ. Congenital cytomegalovirus: Public health action towards awareness, prevention, and treatment. J Clin Virol. 2009 Dec;46 Suppl 4:S1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Oct 29. PMID: 19879187.
- Cahill AG, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Macones GA. Screening and treating for primary cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: where do we stand? A decision-analytic and economic analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;201(5):466.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.056. Epub 2009 Sep 26. PMID: 19782961.
- Walker SP, Palma-Dias R, Wood EM, Shekleton P, Giles ML. Cytomegalovirus in pregnancy: to screen or not to screen. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Apr 18;13:96. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-96. PMID: 23594714; PMCID: PMC3661373.
- Fowler KB, McCollister FP, Sabo DL, Shoup AG, Owen KE, Woodruff JL, Cox E, Mohamed LS, Choo DI, Boppana SB; CHIMES Study. A Targeted Approach for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening Within Newborn Hearing Screening. Pediatrics. 2017 Feb;139(2):e20162128. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2128. Epub 2017 Jan 3. PMID: 28049114; PMCID: PMC5260148.
- Many hospitals have targeted CMV screening programs for newborns that fail their hearing screen
- Universal newborn screening has been proposed to identify asymptomatic infected infants in order to provide monitoring for delayed onset hearing loss > which could lead to earlier educational accommodations, speech/language therapies, and other interventions
- Antiviral therapy is generally not recommended for infected infants who pass newborn screen and are asymptomatic >> although there is an ongoing clinical trial to evaluate whether antiviral therapy would reduce risk of late onset hearing loss in asymptomatic infected newborns: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03301415
- Seems to be cost effective, but most reliable method is not established
A few final notes from Hermione:
- She mentioned CMV Action, which is a resource in the UK from families of children with congenital CMV. They provide information for healthcare workers and the public as well as a source of peer support. Check your local area to see if there are peer supports for your patient and their family
- She mentioned the importance of collaboration and research, such as CCMVNET which is a European clinical network including a registry of children affected by congenital CMV
- There are still so many questions we don’t understand!
- Why are some babies more severely affected than others? That develop hearing loss or do not?
- Why can you have hearing loss at birth as well as a toddler?
- Is it virological? Immunological? A combination?
Goal
Listeners will be able to understand the diagnosis and management of congenital CMV infection
Learning Objectives
After listening to this episode, listeners will be able to:
- Define symptomatic congenital CMV infection and the features of CMV disease in a newborn
- Interpret available diagnostic testing for congenital CMV infection
- Describe the recommended treatment for congenital CMV infection in a symptomatic neonate
Disclosures
Our guest (Hermione Lyall) as well as Febrile podcast and hosts report no relevant financial disclosures
Citation
Lyall, H., Sanchez-Clemente, N., Dong, S. “#37: Curious Congenital Conundrums – Stop, Look, and Listen”. Febrile: A Cultured Podcast. https://player.captivate.fm/episode/edbac33a-6604-44de-8071-9b0050b42e38